24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

What’s happens after verdict or plea of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect in New York?

Procedure following verdict or plea of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect.

Definition of Terms

Definition of terms. As used in this section, the following terms will have the following meanings:

“Commissioner” basically means the state commissioner of mental health, or else the state commissioner of mental retardation and developmental disability.

“Secure facility” basically means a facility in the state office of mental health or else the state office of mental retardation and developmental disabilities which has been staffed with personnel who are adequately trained in security methods and are equipped as to minimize the risk or even danger of escapes, and which has actually been specifically designated by the commissioner.

George FernandezGeorge Fernandez
14:16 30 Apr 24
Excellent 10 out of 10, Helped resolve my case. Jeremy explained everything and made everything easy to understand.
RajRaj
21:33 24 Apr 24
If you are looking for a lawyer that listens, is aggressive where needed, and holds his word above all else, Todd is the best pick. I had hired multiple attorneys prior to hiring the Spodek Group for a white collar case. The first thing that stood out to me was the cost, as anyone going through the process and dealing with the system, money was tight at that time - especially after hiring and firing multiple lawyers. The cost was not as high as others which was definitely a plus. Todd's intake process was also unlike other attorneys. He took the time to actually listen. He cared. He was trying to put himself in my shoes while I was explaining the situation to him and he really took the time to understand the whole situation. Other lawyers will give you 15 mins and send you a retainer agreement. Not Todd, I think he spent almost two hours with me as I was explaining everything.Not only was he great during the onboarding process, he was supportive and very informative through the entire plea process and eventually sentencing. After hiring him, I asked if I should hire a prison consultant, he told me to save my money as he would do everything they would. He was right and held up to his word. Later on I would hear from others that went with the prison consultants that they were a waste of money - I am glad I listened to Todd!When it came time for sentencing, two days prior to sentencing, the prosecutor tried increasing my proposed prison time by almost double - apparently a normal move. Todd and his team worked with me non-stop through the weekend prior to sentencing to ensure that I was not given additional prison time. Again, he took the time to listen and came up with a strategy to explain the case with great detail.Unfortunately, I did plead guilty as that was my best option. Todd and his whole team wrote up nearly 300 pages of a summary of what happened and why I should not be given prison time. If I breakdown the amount I spent with Todd versus the amount of work that I saw being done, I am shocked I was not charged four times as much. The other benefit was, a lot of criminal defense lawyers were just a single attorney with a paralegal or two. Todd had a team of people that I dealt with (5-7 people that I interacted with), but he was ALWAYS accessible. It would never take him more than an hour to reply unless he was in court.I was sentenced to prison and I was emotionally distraught. Todd and his team did whatever they could even after sentencing to make sure I was alright. He personally stayed in touch with my family to ensure I was doing alright and offered support to them. Most lawyers would consider the job complete at sentencing, not Todd.After prison, Todd still spent time with me to make sure I was on the right track and avoiding any potential risks in the future. He has also been giving advice on how to navigate probation etc and has not been looking at the clock for billing.Although I wish I had never been arrested in the first place, I am glad I had Todd and his team in my corner. Without them I likely would have had to spend a lot more time in prison than I did.Thank you, Todd, and the entire Spodek Law team, for helping turn what was a nightmare into a manageable situation!
Yelva Saint-PreuxYelva Saint-Preux
19:26 19 Apr 24
I am immensely grateful to the entire team at Spodek Law Group for their unwavering dedication and exceptional expertise throughout my case. From our initial consultation to the final resolution, their professionalism and tireless advocacy made all the difference. Their strategic approach and attention to detail instilled confidence in me every step of the way.Thanks to their hard work and commitment, we achieved a truly favorable outcome that exceeded my expectations. Not only did they navigate the complexities of my case with precision, but they also provided invaluable support and guidance during what was undoubtedly a challenging time. I cannot recommend Spodek Law Group highly enough, especially attorneys Todd Spodek and Claire Banks; they are beacons of excellence in the legal profession.YSP.
Katherine SunKatherine Sun
18:08 18 Apr 24
my lawyer is Alex Zhik. Efficient, patient and professional
Nun yaNun ya
17:48 18 Apr 24
Todd, Ralph and Alex are amazing. Helped my husband get from a double digit number with multiple charges to a single digit, by the time I blink he will be out. They very professional and help with all your needs. They dealt with my anxiety and worry very well and they understand that your family member needs to get home as soon as possible.
Keisha ParrisKeisha Parris
20:45 15 Mar 24
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko BeautyTaïko Beauty
16:26 15 Mar 24
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence.Thank you team!
K MarK Mar
01:37 25 Jan 24
I recently had Spodek Law Group represent me for a legal matter in NYC and I am thoroughly impressed with their services.Alex Zhik secured the best possible outcome for my case.It was a seamless journey from the initial consultation to the resolution of my legal matter. From the moment I spoke to Todd about my case, his enthusiasm to help was evident, setting a positive tone for the entire experience. The efficiency and professionalism displayed by the team is commendable.A particularly noteworthy aspect of their service is their user-friendly portal to upload your documents/evidence. This not only simplified the process, but showcases their commitment to streamline the client experience.Lastly, in an industry where legal fees can often be a concern, I found their pricing to be very reasonable, making needing legal assistance feel accessible and stress-free.I am grateful for their support and wouldn't hesitate to turn to them again in the future.
js_loader

“Dangerous mental disorder” means that a defendant currently suffers from a “mental illness” as the term’s defined in subdivision twenty of section 1.03 of the mental hygiene law, and that because of this condition he or she currently constitutes a physical danger to himself or others.

“Mentally ill” basically means that a defendant currently suffers from some sort of mental illness for which care and treatment as a patient, in the in-patient services of a psychiatric center under the direct jurisdiction of the state office of mental health, is considered to be essential to the defendant’s welfare and that his or her judgment is so impaired that he or she is unable to understand the need for this care and treatment; and, where a defendant’s mentally retarded, the term “mentally ill” will also mean that the defendant’s in need of care and treatment as a resident in the in-patient services of a developmental center or any other type of residential facility for the mentally retarded and developmentally disabled under the jurisdiction of the state office of mental retardation and developmental disabilities.

“Examination order” basically means an order that’s directed to the commissioner which requires that a defendant must submit to a psychiatric examination to determine whether they have a dangerous mental disorder, or if he or she does not have dangerous mental disorder, whether he or she is mentally ill.

“Commitment order” or “recommitment order” basically means an order that commits a defendant to the custody of the commissioner for confinement in some sort of secure facility for care and treatment for six months after the date of the order.

“First retention order” basically means an order that’s effective at the expiration of the period that’s prescribed in a commitment order for a recommitment order, authorizing continued custody of a defendant by the commissioner for a period that won’t exceed one year.

“Second retention order” basically means an order that’s effective at the expiration of the period that’s prescribed in a first retention order that authorizes continued custody of a defendant by the commissioner for a period that won’t exceed two years.

“Subsequent retention order” basically means an order that’s effective at the expiration of the period that’s prescribed in a second retention order or a prior subsequent retention order that authorizes continued custody of a defendant by the commissioner for a period that won’t exceed two years.

“Retention order” basically means a first retention order, a second retention order, or even a subsequent retention order.

“Furlough order” basically means an order that directs the commissioner to allow a defendant in confinement regarding a commitment order, recommitment order, or even retention order to temporarily leave the facility for a period that won’t exceed fourteen days, either with or without the constant supervision of one or more employees of the facility.

“Transfer order” basically means an order that directs the commissioner to transfer a defendant from a secure facility to a non-secure facility under the direct jurisdiction of the commissioner, or else to any non-secure facility as designated by the commissioner.

“Release order” basically means an order that directs the commissioner to terminate a defendant’s in-patient status without first terminating the commissioner’s responsibility for the defendant.

What’s the examination order in New York?

Examination Order: Psychiatric Examiners

On entry of a verdict of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect, or on the acceptance of a plea of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect, the court has to immediately issue an examination order. On receipt of this order, the commissioner has to designate two qualified psychiatric examiners to conduct the exam of the defendant. In conducting their examination, the psychiatric examiners can use any method which is accepted by the medical profession for the examination of people who are alleged to be suffering from a dangerous mental disorder, or else to be mentally ill or retarded. The court can authorize a psychiatrist or psychologist who’s retained by a defendant to be present at this examination. The clerk of the court has to promptly forward a copy of the examination order to the mental hygiene legal service, and this service can participate afterward in all of the proceedings under this section. In all the later proceedings under this section, before the issuing of a special order of conditions, the court will consider whether any order of protection had been issued before a verdict of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect in the case, or before the acceptance of a plea of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect.

Firearm, Rifle or Shotgun Surrender Order

On entry of a verdict of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect, or on acceptance of a plea of not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect, or even on a finding that the defendant’s an incapacitated person, the court will revoke the defendant’s firearm license, if any, ask the defendant about the existence and location of any firearm, rifle, or shotgun owned or possessed by the defendant and direct the surrender of said firearm, rifle, or shotgun.

Examination Order: Place of Examination

On issuing an examination order, the court must direct that the defendant be committed to a secure facility which has been designated by the commissioner as the place for psychiatric examination. The sheriff has to hold the defendant in custody pending the designation by the commissioner, and when notified of the designation, the sheriff has to promptly deliver the defendant to said secure facility. When the defendant’s not in custody at the time of the verdict or plea because he or she was previously released on bail or on his or her own recognizance, the court may direct that the examination be conducted on an outpatient basis, and at such time and place as the commissioner will designate. If, however, the commissioner informs the court that confinement of the defendant’s necessary for an effective exam, the court has to direct that the defendant be confined in a facility that’s been designated by the commissioner until the exam is completed.

Examination Order: Duration

Confinement in a secure facility will be for a period no longer than thirty days, except that, on application of the commissioner, the court can authorize confinement for an additional period of no longer than thirty days when a longer period is necessary to complete the exam. If the initial hearing has not commenced prior to the termination of the examination period, the commissioner will retain custody of the defendant in said secure facility until custody’s transferred to the sheriff. During the period of confinement, the physician in charge of the facility can administer to the defendant emergency psychiatric, medical, or other therapeutic treatment as in his or her judgment should be administered. If the court has directed that the exam be conducted on an outpatient basis, the exam will be completed within thirty days after the defendant first reported to the place designated by the commissioner, except that, on application of the commissioner, the court can extend the period for a reasonable time if a longer period is necessary to complete the examination.

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now