Blog
New York PPP Loan Fraud Lawyers
New York PPP Loan Fraud and EIDL Loan Fraud Lawyers
If you’re on our website, it’s because there’s a looming legal problem —federal investigators might be looking into your Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) or Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) applications, and you need an experienced legal team to protect your future. At Spodek Law Group, we’ve spent over 50 years combined facing off against state and federal prosecutors, including the DOJ, SBA, IRS, and other government entities. Our goal is simple: we want to get these charges dismissed, or significantly reduce them, so you can get back to your life. Below, we’ll break down what federal PPP/EIDL fraud investigations typically look like, the potential pitfalls you might be facing, and the defenses that might help you get out of this situation.
The Federal Framework: Why PPP/EIDL Fraud Investigations Are Serious
Federal jurisdiction in PPP and EIDL cases originates from the CARES Act, a federal statute that allocated funds to help businesses weather the economic storm of the COVID-19 pandemic. Because these are federal loans, allegations of misrepresentation—from inflated payroll numbers to questionable usage of loan proceeds—can quickly land you in the crosshairs of federal prosecutors. If you find yourself looking for answers while the FBI or SBA calls you in for questioning, you’re not alone. We’ve seen countless business owners, entrepreneurs, and even sole proprietors get shocked by how swiftly the federal government can build a case (see 18 U.S.C. § 1343 for wire fraud and 18 U.S.C. § 1344 for bank fraud).
- Double Jeopardy Considerations
You might be wondering, “Can they really charge me twice?” Typically, double jeopardy (under the Fifth Amendment) prevents repeated prosecution for the same federal offense. However, a separate state-level case could still arise if New York State authorities decide you violated state law, like if identity theft under state statutes is the allegation. This nuanced interplay between federal and state “sovereigns” is something we’ve navigated for years. Simply put, you want a law firm that gets the complexities of overlapping jurisdictions—and knows how to fight in both arenas.
Potential Charges and Penalties
In PPP/EIDL fraud cases, prosecutors often layer multiple charges in order to maximize the penalties, and increase the chances of a conviction:
- Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343): Alleging false statements via electronic communications.
- Bank Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344): Claiming you deceived a financial institution to secure a loan.
- Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371): Suggesting you partnered with others to commit fraud.
- Aggravated Identity Theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028A): Stacking on if personal data was misused or forged.
The possible penalties range from severe fines to lengthy federal prison sentences. Federal Sentencing Guidelines can also pile on “enhancements” for things like large dollar losses, multiple victims, and alleged “sophisticated means.” Many clients come to us scared by these prospects—but rest assured, we know exactly how to analyze every element of the prosecutor’s case and create a defense strategy that works.
Defense Strategies
At Spodek Law Group, we focus on outcomes. We start by analyzing the facts of your case—and we don’t stop until we find a path that sets you up for the best possible resolution. Below are examples of defense strategies that might apply to your situation, complete with hypothetical scenarios we’ve encountered (or fought) in practice.
1. Lack of Fraudulent Intent — The “Good Faith” Scenario
- Situation: You’re a small business owner in Manhattan trying to keep the doors open. You hire a part-time accountant to handle the PPP application. That accountant, unfamiliar with ever-shifting SBA guidance, mistakenly categorizes certain personal draws as payroll. Now the federal government alleges you “knowingly falsified information.”
- Defense Approach: We highlight the genuine confusion surrounding SBA guidelines early in the pandemic, especially as rules evolved. We examine your communications with the accountant, the lender, and any documents you relied upon. Our goal is to demonstrate you didn’t intend to mislead anyone. In federal fraud cases, intent is everything; if we can show the error was inadvertent, it can derail the prosecution’s narrative of willful deceit.
2. Insufficient Evidence — The “Paper Trail Gaps” Argument
- Situation: You operate a startup in Brooklyn and used PPP funds to license new software you deemed “essential.” Prosecutors claim the software purchase was unnecessary.
- Defense Approach: We methodically analyze receipts, internal memos, meeting notes, and vendor correspondence to show a legitimate business rationale. Remember, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you committed fraud. If their evidence is shaky, we leverage that weakness—possibly filing a pre-trial motion to dismiss on grounds of insufficient proof.
3. Entrapment or Government-Induced Error — The “Misleading Guidance” Defense
- Situation: A so-called “loan consultant” who claims ties to the SBA encouraged you to shift EIDL funds around or include ineligible expenses. Suddenly, investigators accuse you of gross misappropriation.
- Defense Approach: If we can prove you wouldn’t have done anything wrong but for the misleading instructions of someone posing as a government agent—or actually working with authorities—we argue entrapment. This requires meticulous documentation of emails, texts, and calls that show you acted only in response to official (or purportedly official) guidance. Entrapment defenses can be potent, but they demand a thorough, evidence-heavy presentation.
4. Unconstitutional Searches — The “Fourth Amendment” Shield
- Situation: Federal agents raid your home office without a properly obtained warrant, seizing laptops, ledgers, and personal documents.
- Defense Approach: We’ll file a motion to suppress evidence under the principle that illegally obtained evidence violates your Fourth Amendment rights (see Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)). If the judge rules that evidence was collected unlawfully, it can’t be used to build the government’s case. This strategy has tanked prosecutions where evidence was the linchpin.
Sentencing Guidelines and Plea Negotiations
Many PPP/EIDL fraud cases end in negotiated pleas—especially if prosecutors believe you misrepresented large sums. Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, the level of the offense climbs with the financial “loss amount” and other alleged aggravating factors. However, there can also be downward ways to reduce the severity. For example, if you demonstrate acceptance of responsibility, or if you provide significant cooperation about a conspiracy. Our goal is to ensure that if plea negotiations are the best route, you’re getting the most favorable deal. And if trial is the way forward, we’ll prepare an aggressive defense that challenges every element of the government’s case.
Why Spodek Law Group Is a Game-Changer
Choosing the right attorney could be the single biggest decision you make if you’re under federal investigation. At Spodek Law Group, we pride ourselves on having a rock star team of criminal defense attorneys who fight tirelessly for our clients. We handle federal and state cases across the nation, and we never hesitate to go head-to-head with the DOJ, FBI, or NY State prosecutors if it means defending your future.
- Over 50 Years of Combined Experience: Our attorneys have seen it all—from first-time offenders caught up in minor allegations to high-profile defendants facing nationwide scrutiny.
- 24/7 Accessibility: We understand the anxiety you’re experiencing. Our team is on standby, day or night, to address your concerns.
- Deep Knowledge of Federal Law: We don’t just sometimes handle federal cases—we are fluent in them. Our attorneys understand how the U.S. Attorney’s Office builds a case and have a track record of challenging evidence effectively.
- Nationwide Reach: Whether you’re in NYC or across the country, our online portal enables seamless communication, document sharing, and strategy sessions, ensuring you’re never left in the dark.
- Client-Centric Focus: We only take on cases we believe we can help, and we commit ourselves wholeheartedly to winning or significantly reducing your charges. No “mill” mentality here—we offer personalized, strategic counsel built around you.
Take Action—Now
Time is your enemy in federal PPP/EIDL fraud investigations. The longer you wait, the more opportunity the government has to build its case. When you contact Spodek Law Group, you’re taking the first critical step toward reclaiming control over your future. We offer a risk-free consultation, where you can share every detail of your situation, ask the tough questions, and receive straightforward advice about potential next steps. If the allegations against you are serious, now is the time to act. Don’t let fear or uncertainty derail your life—reach out today, and let us start crafting a defense strategy that stands up to prosecutorial scrutiny.
We’re Here to Fight for You
Whether you legitimately misunderstood SBA guidelines or got swept up in an overly aggressive federal crackdown, you deserve an attorney who treats you like family. At Spodek Law Group, we’re passionately committed to helping you navigate this complicated legal system. We know what’s at stake: your freedom, your finances, and your future. If there’s a way to get your case dismissed, we’ll pursue it. If a plea is in your best interest, we’ll negotiate from a position of strength. If a trial is necessary, we’ll stand shoulder to shoulder with you at every turn. That’s the Spodek Law Group difference—and we’re ready to show you what it means to have a team that truly cares. Don’t face this alone. Reach out now, and let us start defending your tomorrow, today.