YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW INVENTING ANNA
When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.
Los Angeles DEA Audit and Investigation Lawyers
Handling a DEA Audit and Investigation as a Healthcare Provider in California
It is common for a healthcare provider in California to experience a Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) audit and investigation. Should any serious violations of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) be detected, a healthcare prover could face everything from administrative actions to criminal prosecution. Many healthcare providers will want legal assistance during such an audit. An experienced attorney will know how to properly handle the process and provide important legal guidance.
Compliance
The audits and investigations conducted on healthcare providers are to confirm compliance with the CSA. These audits occur for a number of reasons. The DEA may have received a tip by a patient or pharmacy concerning a particular healthcare provider’s practices with regards to prescriptions. They may have detected a significant change in a healthcare provider’s pattern for writing prescriptions when compared to similar providers. It is also possible the DEA wants to conduct a random audit and investigation to ensure CSA compliance.
Warrants and Notices of Inspection
The DEA has no legal obligation to provide a search warrant when it comes to a healthcare provider’s location in order to conduct an audit. A search warrant will be required if the DEA is part of a criminal investigation conducted by other government agencies. The DEA audit starts with providing a Notice of Inspection of Controlled Premises. This notice is known as DEA Form 82. This form must be given to the subject prior to starting the audit process.
Informed Consent
Once the DEA presents Form 82, it is up to the subject of the audit to give its informed consent prior to the audit taking place. This informed consent is done with a written statement. The subject of the audit must write that they’ve been informed of their constitutional rights concerning the audit. They must also acknowledge if something of a criminal nature is discovered as a result of the audit, it can be used against them for criminal prosecution. They must also include a statement of their voluntary consent.
If you are looking for a lawyer that listens, is aggressive where needed, and holds his word above all else, Todd is the best pick. I had hired multiple attorneys prior to hiring the Spodek Group for a white collar case. The first thing that stood out to me was the cost, as anyone going through the process and dealing with the system, money was tight at that time - especially after hiring and firing multiple lawyers. The cost was not as high as others which was definitely a plus. Todd's intake process was also unlike other attorneys. He took the time to actually listen. He cared. He was trying to put himself in my shoes while I was explaining the situation to him and he really took the time to understand the whole situation. Other lawyers will give you 15 mins and send you a retainer agreement. Not Todd, I think he spent almost two hours with me as I was explaining everything.Not only was he great during the onboarding process, he was supportive and very informative through the entire plea process and eventually sentencing. After hiring him, I asked if I should hire a prison consultant, he told me to save my money as he would do everything they would. He was right and held up to his word. Later on I would hear from others that went with the prison consultants that they were a waste of money - I am glad I listened to Todd!When it came time for sentencing, two days prior to sentencing, the prosecutor tried increasing my proposed prison time by almost double - apparently a normal move. Todd and his team worked with me non-stop through the weekend prior to sentencing to ensure that I was not given additional prison time. Again, he took the time to listen and came up with a strategy to explain the case with great detail.Unfortunately, I did plead guilty as that was my best option. Todd and his whole team wrote up nearly 300 pages of a summary of what happened and why I should not be given prison time. If I breakdown the amount I spent with Todd versus the amount of work that I saw being done, I am shocked I was not charged four times as much. The other benefit was, a lot of criminal defense lawyers were just a single attorney with a paralegal or two. Todd had a team of people that I dealt with (5-7 people that I interacted with), but he was ALWAYS accessible. It would never take him more than an hour to reply unless he was in court.I was sentenced to prison and I was emotionally distraught. Todd and his team did whatever they could even after sentencing to make sure I was alright. He personally stayed in touch with my family to ensure I was doing alright and offered support to them. Most lawyers would consider the job complete at sentencing, not Todd.After prison, Todd still spent time with me to make sure I was on the right track and avoiding any potential risks in the future. He has also been giving advice on how to navigate probation etc and has not been looking at the clock for billing.Although I wish I had never been arrested in the first place, I am glad I had Todd and his team in my corner. Without them I likely would have had to spend a lot more time in prison than I did.Thank you, Todd, and the entire Spodek Law team, for helping turn what was a nightmare into a manageable situation!
I am immensely grateful to the entire team at Spodek Law Group for their unwavering dedication and exceptional expertise throughout my case. From our initial consultation to the final resolution, their professionalism and tireless advocacy made all the difference. Their strategic approach and attention to detail instilled confidence in me every step of the way.Thanks to their hard work and commitment, we achieved a truly favorable outcome that exceeded my expectations. Not only did they navigate the complexities of my case with precision, but they also provided invaluable support and guidance during what was undoubtedly a challenging time. I cannot recommend Spodek Law Group highly enough, especially attorneys Todd Spodek and Claire Banks; they are beacons of excellence in the legal profession.YSP.
Todd, Ralph and Alex are amazing. Helped my husband get from a double digit number with multiple charges to a single digit, by the time I blink he will be out. They very professional and help with all your needs. They dealt with my anxiety and worry very well and they understand that your family member needs to get home as soon as possible.
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence.Thank you team!
I recently had Spodek Law Group represent me for a legal matter in NYC and I am thoroughly impressed with their services.Alex Zhik secured the best possible outcome for my case.It was a seamless journey from the initial consultation to the resolution of my legal matter. From the moment I spoke to Todd about my case, his enthusiasm to help was evident, setting a positive tone for the entire experience. The efficiency and professionalism displayed by the team is commendable.A particularly noteworthy aspect of their service is their user-friendly portal to upload your documents/evidence. This not only simplified the process, but showcases their commitment to streamline the client experience.Lastly, in an industry where legal fees can often be a concern, I found their pricing to be very reasonable, making needing legal assistance feel accessible and stress-free.I am grateful for their support and wouldn't hesitate to turn to them again in the future.
Refusing Informed Consent
There are many reasons the subject of a DEA audit may refuse to provide their informed consent. They realize their refusal will usually cause the DEA to obtain an administrative search warrant. It is recommended the subject of a DEA audit and investigation immediately obtain legal counsel when presented with DEA Form 82. A healthcare provider may want to reschedule because of seeing a high level of clients combined with lower then necessary staff levels. The individuals responsible for dealing with audits and investigations may not be immediately available. The provider may want to review their operation and make certain they’re as organized as necessary to show compliance with the CSA.
Administrative Search Warrants
Should the DEA be refused informed consent, they will try to obtain an administrative search warrant form a U.S. Federal District Court. This is not like obtaining a regular search warrant. In this case, the DEA does not have to provide evidence of probable cause. It is only required to provide reasons for the nature and extent of their inspection. The DEA is also required to provide the scope of their inspection as well as any type of items they intend to seize. Courts commonly grant such DEA administrative warrants. Once the subject of a DEA audit is presented with an administrative search warrant, they must comply. If this does not happen, those involved could be subject to arrest and criminal prosecution.
Extent of Audit And Investigation
When the subject of an audit and investigation by the DEA is given an administrative warrant, it’s important to know it doesn’t give the DEA authority to audit or investigate everything. There are limits to what the DEA is able to inspect. A recent court decision did include patient records as part of an investigation and audit process. The DEA can interview a healthcare provider as well as staff. Any information obtained during the audit and investigation can be used in a criminal or administrative proceedings if necessary.
Consequences
If the DEA believes there have been laws broken in regards to the CSA, they can make a referral to the U.S. Attorneys Office. This could lead to a fine or criminal prosecution. If found guilty, it’s possible to the guilty party could receive a $100,000 fine as well as a year in prison. Those who are found to be simply negligent could be fined up to $10,000 for each occurrence.
