Blog
Just received federal target letter in the mail?
I know how scary it is to get a letter in the mail that screams “federal target,” because the first time you see it, your mind races, and you start to wonder if your life’s about to be turned upside down, and you’ve probably heard all kinds of stories from friends, or maybe you’ve seen something about it on TV, so it’s no surprise that you’re feeling frightened. At Spodek Law Group, I—and our entire team—approach situations like these with meticulous dedication, which Todd Spodek learned from his father, and it’s a legacy we’re proud to continue: the idea that no client should ever feel abandoned or blindsided, especially when the letter itself can feel so abrupt. A federal target letter is basically a notice telling you that you may be a subject in a criminal investigation or possibly about to face an indictment, and if you’re panicking right now, rest assured you’re not alone because many people in New York, Los Angeles, or anywhere else nationwide have been in similar shoes.
WHY DID YOU RECEIVE THIS LETTER?
You might wonder why you specifically got this letter, and the truth is, under the Department of Justice guidelines, prosecutors tend to send target letters when their investigation suggests you’re more than just a witness, so it’s a heads-up that you could be indicted, plus it gives you a chance to get a lawyer on board before things escalate further, and that’s exactly where our firm’s nationwide reach comes in, because whether you’re in Manhattan, Brooklyn, or way over in Los Angeles, we can build a carefully coordinated defense. At Spodek Law Group, we use a fully digital client portal so you can keep track of every case-related document we file, every court date we schedule, and every piece of evidence that might show up, which really helps reduce that sense of helplessness, and Todd Spodek credits this approach to his passion for blending technology and transparency, not to mention he learned first-hand—during the Netflix spotlight on his representation of Anna Delvey—how critical it is to maintain communication with clients. Our strategy often starts with dissecting the exact language of the letter, scrutinizing the applicable statutes (whether it’s 18 U.S.C. § 1343 for wire fraud or 21 U.S.C. § 841 for controlled substance issues) and, if needed, investigating whether the prosecutors followed the guidance from cases like United States v. Mechanik, 475 U.S. 66 (1986), which explained how procedural irregularities in grand jury proceedings can sometimes be challenged, but each situation is unique, so we dial into the specific angles that make the most sense.
GETTING SINGLED OUT
Now, why would you be singled out—maybe someone mentioned your name in a proffer session, maybe you signed off on financial documents that federal agents suspect are tied to fraud, or maybe they’re investigating a larger scheme and your involvement is just a tiny piece, but whoever’s naming you, and for whichever reason, the crux of our legal strategy at Spodek Law Group is always to unearth every detail, looking for ways that challenge the prosecution’s narrative and calling on Todd Spodek’s extensive experience arguing cases in federal courts. We might file motions to dismiss if the evidence doesn’t match the grand jury allegations, or we might leverage procedural missteps if law enforcement conducted questionable searches, as guided by cases like United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), which shaped the “good faith” exception on warrant issues, but depending on your circumstances, it may be that the best defense is to negotiate pre-indictment, or push for a favorable plea deal that mitigates prison time, because not every defendant wants to roll the dice at trial. Setting up a “white glove” approach means we keep you informed at every juncture—through phone calls at odd hours, through our digital portal if you just need to upload more paperwork, or in person at our offices in NYC or LA—because in Todd Spodek’s view, worry and confusion grow stronger when communication is lacking.
WHAT ARE YOUR POSSIBLE DEFENSE ROUTES?
Well, in my experience, if you possess exculpatory evidence—like something proving you weren’t involved, or that you acted on bad information—our team at Spodek Law Group can make a compelling argument to the U.S. Attorney’s Office that they should reconsider seeking an indictment, and Todd Spodek has repeatedly emphasized that the best defense starts as early as possible, so if we can gather all the mitigating facts before they present evidence to the grand jury, that’s our opportunity to be proactive. For instance, we might use forensic experts to analyze emails, we might dive into phone records to show you never interacted with alleged conspirators, or we might gather sworn affidavits from witnesses who reinforce your side of the story, but each of these steps is tailored to the specific allegations you’re facing, since your situation isn’t exactly like anyone else’s. Sometimes, if the prosecution sees we’re fully prepared, they’re more open to negotiating, and even if it doesn’t lead to a complete dismissal, it could mean a lesser charge or more favorable sentencing parameters, which is why we invest so heavily in custom-tailored strategies that respect the nuances of every single client’s position.
SHOULD YOU TALK TO INVESTIGATORS BEFORE CALLING US?
Honestly, if there’s one takeaway here, it’s that trying to handle this on your own can be risky, because investigators are trained to elicit statements that might later be used against you, and Todd Spodek has seen firsthand how a casual conversation with federal agents—even after they say “we just want your side of the story”—may end up complicating your defense if you inadvertently reveal something you shouldn’t, so we always tell clients: talk to us first. Consider how controlling the flow of information is essential to building a coherent defense strategy, especially if prosecutors rely on your statements to establish intent or knowledge, which they have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Our white glove approach means we’ll even role-play potential interviews with you beforehand, not to script your answers, but to ensure you don’t give up more than you need to, and we’ll reference steps laid out in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), which basically underscores your right to remain silent and consult with counsel, so it’s better to exercise that right than to regret oversharing later.
WHAT IF YOU’VE ALREADY BEEN CONTACTED?
If you’ve spoken with the agents or responded to an email from a federal prosecutor, don’t panic, because we often have ways to mitigate any statements made, possibly through motions to exclude them if constitutional violations occurred, or if the officers didn’t properly advise you of your rights, referencing cases such as Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), which clarified that once you request counsel, interrogation should cease, but even if everything was done by the book, Todd Spodek’s philosophy is to figure out how best to position your narrative, maybe we can show that any confusing or incomplete statements were the result of duress or misunderstanding. The digital portal at Spodek Law Group can also help because you can log in and share any transcripts or notes you took relating to those communications—it really speeds up our review, which helps us craft a stronger response. Ultimately, we believe no single interaction dooms you forever, because federal law is always about the bigger picture, and if we can reshape that picture, then your case is far from lost.
KEY STEPS RIGHT AFTER RECEIVING A TARGET LETTER
• Maintain Silence: Don’t discuss details of your case with anyone other than your attorney, because casual disclosures can end up in the wrong hands, so it’s always better to keep quiet.
• Preserve Documents: Save emails, texts, receipts—whatever might be relevant—since destroying them can lead to obstruction charges, and Todd Spodek has seen how even an innocent cleanup routine can be misconstrued as evidence tampering.
• Consult Expert Counsel: Reach out immediately, whether it’s a phone call, an email, or a quick message through our digital client portal, because the sooner we start building your defense, the more options we’ll likely have.
• Stay Calm: Overthinking or panicking won’t help, so if possible, try to proceed methodically, and that’s where we arrive as your ally, guiding you step-by-step.
OUR CORE PHILOSOPHY & INVESTIGATIVE APPROACH
One of our biggest guiding principles at Spodek Law Group is choosing clients that we genuinely believe we can help, which is why Todd Spodek’s father always taught him to never take on a case out of pure convenience or profit—our philosophy is that if we can’t bring meaningful improvement to someone’s situation, we’d rather refer them elsewhere. That said, once we do accept a case, we engage in relentless fact-finding, and we use all the tools technology can offer—like scanning, digitizing, and indexing every single relevant document in a secure client folder—so we can swiftly identify patterns or inconsistencies in the prosecution’s evidence, and that’s why the Netflix coverage that featured Todd revealed how detail-oriented we get, because especially in high-profile matters (like the Anna Delvey case), missing a single piece of evidence can be the difference between an acquittal and a conviction, or between a deal and a dead-end.
HOW LONG DOES THE PROCESS TAKE?
So, how long does this process usually take? Truthfully, it varies wildly: sometimes a target letter turns into a formal indictment within a few weeks, other times it might stretch on for months, and we’ve even seen cases where the investigation quietly fizzled out, but no matter the timeline, we stay on top of every development by checking in with the assigned Assistant U.S. Attorney, filing the appropriate motions, or negotiating behind the scenes to see if a pre-indictment resolution is on the table. If we sense the government is slow-rolling or dragging its feet, Todd Spodek often encourages a more direct approach, including sending well-reasoned legal briefs that highlight weaknesses in the government’s case, potentially citing supreme court precedents like Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), which obligates prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence, because if they’re withholding something that could exonerate you, we want to know about it ASAP. And whether you’re located in California, Florida, or just down the street from our New York office, our nationwide team can coordinate everything digitally so that delays are minimized, and you can see updates every step of the way.
POTENTIAL OUTCOMES
Finally, let’s talk outcomes, because I know that’s probably the question burning in your mind: “Will I go to jail?” or “Can you get these charges dropped?” The answers depend on everything from the strength of the government’s evidence, to whether your rights were compromised, to whether we uncover new facts that exonerate you, which is why Todd Spodek and our attorneys always commit to an unrelenting search for solutions—sometimes that means a trial, sometimes it means a well-negotiated deal, and sometimes, after seeing our evidence, the government decides to walk away. We can’t promise miracles, but we do promise total transparency about fees (no hidden costs), total honesty about your chances (no sugarcoating), and a 24/7 availability if you need to ask a question at three in the morning because you just can’t sleep, which is what our “white glove” ethos is all about—caring for you as a person, not just a case file.
DISCLAIMER
Disclaimer: This article offers general information and a glimpse into how we usually handle federal target letter defenses, but it’s not a replacement for one-on-one legal advice, because every case has its unique complications. If you have questions, or you’re unsure whether something applies to your situation, call us, shoot us an email, or get in touch however is easiest, and we’ll talk through your case, because that familiar sense of relief you feel once you realize you’re not going through this alone—that’s what we strive to provide at Spodek Law Group, and Todd Spodek has always said, “We’d rather you ask us too many questions than miss a crucial piece of information that could protect you.”
TAKE THE NEXT STEP
Take the Next Step: If you’ve received a federal target letter, I understand you’re under a lot of pressure and confusion—which is okay, because everyone feels that way at this stage, but remember, the government doesn’t automatically win just because you got a scary piece of mail. Todd Spodek and our team stand ready to fight for you, whether that means picking apart the prosecutor’s claims, challenging evidence gathered in violation of your Fourth Amendment rights, or finding the smallest procedural defects that might secure you a dismissal or a better deal. Call us or email us, day or night, and let’s discuss a tailored plan that helps you move forward, because we believe in harnessing every available resource—from technology to investigative experts—to defend your interests, and with offices in New York and Los Angeles, plus a network of attorneys throughout the country, we’ll make sure you’re not alone in this fight.